|
I have to let
you go…. it's not working out….. please collect
your personal items…. it's time we part our
ways.
Employee:
Before you terminate me, is there anything else
I can do?
Employer:
No, I'm sorry, however, we liked you, so we will
not contest your unemployment benefits. Leave
your keys with my secretary.
6 weeks
later……. Employer and Employee find themselves
face to face at an unemployment hearing.
|
Claimant's Rep: So
getting back to the issue of an
investigation, did you or did you not do an
investigation of the claimant?
Human
Resources: Yes,
but I didn‘t look at his record.
Claimant's rep:
Then what exactly did you investigate?
Human
Resources: I asked the supervisor what
happened.
Claimant's rep:
Did you ask the claimant?
Human
Resources: No.
|
|
Typically,
the employer does not do an adequate
investigation and fires an employee based on a
recommendation of a supervisor or impulsive
reaction to an incident.
Claimant's
rep:
Are you saying that you
fired a dependable, hardworking employee of 22
years because he was inquisitive?
Employer:
No, I'm saying I fired him because he touched my
chicken.
The
employer's tax rate goes up exponentially for
every successful claimant. The employer is going
to protect his monetary interest. The employer
is not going to sit back and allow the former
employee to succeed. It's a fight.
But, if Spencer is on your side, it's a fair
fight.
Claimant's
rep: Nevertheless, I
would think a chaplain would have a little more
compassion.
Chaplain:
It's still business- people are----
Claimant's
rep: Excuse me. There is no question
pending.
Claimant's
rep: But doesn't the
reporter and the cameraman work as a team?
Supervisor:
yes.
Claimant's
rep: And aren't you
the TV station that advertises “Team Coverage”?
Supervisor:
yes.
Claimant's
rep: So there is only
“team coverage” when you get a story, but no
“team responsibility” when it comes to lost
equipment?
Supervisor:
pause ….good point……I guess not.

Claimant's rep: And the reason you had
success with the 8 th grade and the claimant did
not is because you were more competent? Is that
what you said?
Ms. Newkirk:
Yes.
Claimant's
rep: Have you ever
seen the claimant teach?
Ms. Newkirk:
No.
|